MediaTek Helio G99 vs Snapdragon 680: Which one is better SoC?
The MediaTek Helio G99 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 are two of the most popular 4G mid-range mobile SoCs on the market today. Both chips offer good performance and battery life, but they have different strengths and weaknesses.
In this guide, we will compare the two chips in detail, so you can decide which one is right for you.
MediaTek Helio G99
The Helio G99 is a 6 nm Octa-core processor with two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at up to 2.2GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at up to 2GHz. It also has a Mali-G57 MC2 GPU clocked at up to 950MHz. Our recent hot selling heavy-duty smartphone Blackview BV9300 Pro is such a rugged phone equipped with G99 processor. It runs up to 353,283 on Antutu. Check more Helio G99 tough phones.
The G99 processor is designed for gaming and multimedia, and it offers good performance in both areas. In benchmarks, it typically outperforms the Snapdragon 680. However, it also consumes more power, so battery life is not as good.
The Helio G99 also supports up to 12GB of LPDDR4x RAM and UFS 2.1 storage. It doesn't have a built-in 5G modem, so it can't support 5G connectivity.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
The Snapdragon 680 is a 6 nm octa-core processor with four Cortex-A73 cores clocked at up to 2.4GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores clocked at up to 1.8GHz. It runs 269,469 on Antutu. It also has an Adreno 610 GPU, thus it performance worse than the G99's GPU in such as games.
The Snapdragon 680 is designed for general-purpose use, and it offers good performance in most tasks. It is not as fast as the Helio G99 in gaming, but it consumes less power, so battery life is better.
The Snapdragon 680 also supports up to 12GB of LPDDR4x RAM and UFS 2.1 storage. It does not have a built-in 5G modem, so it can only support 4G connectivity.
Which SoC is better?
Both processors are good SoCs in the mid-range smartphone market. The Snapdragon 680 provides longer lasting battery life, and the Helio G99 provides better game performance.
Read also,
